New York would be the first US city to adopt congestion pricing, but others could soon follow. Elected officials in Portland, Seattle, and Los Angeles are mulling their own plans to ease gridlock while also raising money to improve aging transit systems.
And European cities, already known for their strict rules on urban driving and congestion charges, are cracking down even more on gas- and diesel-burning vehicles in an effort to fight climate change.
The timing is critical: Despite early promises that ride-sharing would lead to fewer cars on the road, Uber and Lyft have been found to cause an increase in congestion in many cities. Federal funding to improve and expand public transportation has dried up, leaving cities scrambling to find other revenue streams. And autonomous vehicles, held up as a remedy for the chilling increase in traffic deaths, could actually make things worse.
Even if we end up sharing these robot taxi trips with each other, the trips will be so cheap they could poach riders from public transportation, causing ridership to plummet and fare revenue to dry up.
Congestion pricing has been bouncing around academic circles for decades. Add to that a tidal wave of delivery vehicles bearing Amazon packages, and Uber and Lyft cars bearing jockeying for space, and you have a perfect storm of gridlock and pollution in many major cities. This plan is the fourth attempt to pass congestion pricing in over 10 years. It required near-constant lobbying by advocates, as well as a bit of political finesse to get New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who are bitter rivals, to eventually come together and endorse the plan.
But passage in New York could bolster those efforts. New York has led the nation before: the city was one of the first to ban smoking indoors, and more recently, it established a minimum wage for Uber and Lyft drivers. But no other US city is as far along as New York. He advised forming an advisory council to further investigate how a congestion pricing policy would work in LA.
Other cities are inching toward plans of their own. For full information on London congestion charge discounts and exemptions visit TfL's Congestion Charge page. Some vehicles that are more polluting may face additional charges when driving within the Ultra Low Emissions Zone — which covers all areas within the North and South Circular roads. Check our driving in London section for more information.
You can also travel around London on public transport using contactless payment or Oyster cards. Follow the coronavirus guidance for London. COVID information. The Congestion Charge applies to most vehicles entering central London. Certain vehicles were charged for entering specified parts of the capital, with cameras used to identify drivers not paying the relevant fee.
What about today and the imminent future? Do any other UK cities have congestion charges? Bath looks set to be the first UK city away from London to introduce a congestion charge after being identified - along with 30 or so others - as having areas which will exceed legal NO2 levels by What about around the world?
Are congestion charges working? The downsides Five years on from the introduction of the London Congestion Charge, it was generally deemed an overall success in reducing congestion and encouraging people to use alternative and often greener forms of transport while generating reasonable revenues to reinvest into the city.
Many organisations and businesses, though, such as John Lewis and the London Chamber of Commerce, either blamed the LCC for a fall in footfall and revenue or for motivating firms to relocate outside of London. Something clearly needs to be done. Are congestion charges fair? Depending on when a vehicle enters a certain road affects its proportionate contribution to the build-up of congestion, motorists who get stuck in queues for longer time periods than others naturally feeling that charges are less fair.
Although the poorest in society are less likely to own cars and more likely to use public transport or taxis, plenty of people in the low-income bracket do drive into cities. Removing congestion charges, tolls and other forms of pricing from cities would almost certainly result in congestion spiralling out of control, which would benefit nobody financially, socially, environmentally or in terms of health. What about for businesses? The business community has frequently hit out at the LCC over the years; the recent T-Charge in particular.
There is a fear that this will be the final straw that closes businesses and takes jobs.
0コメント